Why Counting on an Inheritance for Retirement Is Risky
Financial advisers warn that banking on the Great Wealth Transfer for retirement security is a dangerous gamble most Americans can't afford.
Millions of Americans are eyeing the so-called Great Wealth Transfer — the historic intergenerational movement of assets from Baby Boomers to younger generations — as a potential retirement lifeline. But at least one financial adviser is sounding a clear alarm: don't count on it.
The warning cuts to the heart of a growing behavioral trend in which some individuals are quietly factoring expected inheritances into their long-term financial plans, potentially underestimating how much they actually need to save on their own. That kind of assumption, financial professionals caution, can leave people dangerously underprepared if the anticipated windfall never arrives — or arrives far smaller than expected.
Read more Affordable Used Cars Under $20K Are Scarce and Selling Fast →
There are several reasons an expected inheritance can evaporate. Longer life expectancies mean parents and grandparents may spend far more of their assets on healthcare, assisted living, or simply on enjoying their own retirement years. Estate plans can change, family dynamics shift, and economic downturns can erode portfolios that once looked substantial. Any one of these factors can dramatically reduce — or eliminate — what a beneficiary ultimately receives.
The practical takeaway for retirement savers is straightforward: treat any potential inheritance as a bonus, not a foundation. Building a retirement strategy around personal savings, employer-sponsored plans, and other controllable variables remains the only reliable path to financial security in later life. Windfalls, by definition, are uncertain — and uncertainty is a poor cornerstone for a decades-long financial plan.
Continue reading at MarketWatch.com
